MLK’s speech 50 years on: Has racism become smarter?

Creator unknown.

Fifty years ago today, Martin Luther King, Jr. gave his momentous, stirring speech “I have a dream”.  But do we listen, feel elevated and inspired, but then ignore it like a dream forgotten as soon as we wake up? And in the process, is racism just getting smarter at subsisting?

I remember being around eight years old, walking to school, and a driver shouting “Paki!” out of his van window as he drove past me.

And I vividly recall going on a family trip to Bournemouth, getting into a taxi and a group of passers-by instructing the driver: “Take them home, mate.” I knew they didn’t mean here in the UK.

It doesn’t feel so long ago that I was asked by my schoolmates: “Which skin colour are you closest to: black or white?” Because brown was clearly insignificant, or a sub-race at the most.

But it wasn’t just the children that held these views. My school teacher would always ask the three Indian origin girls in the class – including me – to clear up everyone’s mess after an art lesson.

I could go on: my dad being spat at whilst driving and eggs being thrown as mum and I walked down the street.

Fashionable to be Indian

Then all of a sudden, Naomi Campbell wore a sari for her seductive single, ‘Love and Tears.’ Out of the blue, I started being told my skin colour is “beautiful” because I have an all-season tan. White women started donning bindis and saris and everyone was talking about yoga, meditation and their lifelong wish to see the Taj Mahal or Goa.

Suddenly, it became fashionable to be Indian.

Were people becoming more open-minded and accepting, I wondered. Was racism becoming, dare I say it, obsolete? Well, it was easy to be fooled by this surface of hope. But I’ve always been dubious about how meaningful that apparent change was.

Racism still exists, and quite strongly too. Not only that, it’s getting smarter so that it can continue to exist. Racists have learnt it’s not enough to shout derogatory terms to non-whites, but that they should manipulate their views to make them sound convincing, or emulate the language or perceived intentions of politicians.

You only need to read the comments on Twitter made by the so-called English Defence League and learn about the manifesto of the British National Party. Even higher-ranked politicians are quick to make immigrants scapegoats in an economic blunder actually caused by the well-to-do.

Racism isn’t smart

The murder of black teenager Stephen Lawrence in London took almost 20 years to reach some sort of resolution; Italy’s first black minister, Cecile Kyenge, had bananas thrown at her during a rally; the slaughter of a soldier in London by an Islamist provoked hate attacks on innocent Muslims.

And it’s even an inherent part of the leisurely sphere of sport, with black and Asian footballers playing their game to the tune of racist chants and monkey noises. Again, I could go on.

But racism itself isn’t smart; in fact, it couldn’t lack less knowledge if it tried. Some perpetrators try to disguise such shallow views with a thin veil of acceptable language and demeanour.

The truth of the matter is, people are not born racists and we certainly do not come in to this world seething with hate. It is society and culture that define our thinking.

It sounds simple, but instead of letting these attitudes live and breed in darkness, we should be opening up frank discussions, peacefully and rationally.

Of course, there isn’t always that opportunity for dialogue. But sometimes I wish I asked my school mates why they saw the colour brown as insignificant. Maybe they wouldn’t have understood. But what if they did? How did their views of Asians formulate as they grew older and if I had questioned them, how may these have changed?

Another schoolteacher of mine used to ask myself and another Indian girl to tidy up after class. I couldn’t hold back any longer and asked him why he only expected us to clean, and others free to go home? He didn’t know what to say, made excuses but then never asked us again. Maybe, his views didn’t change. But, perhaps they did.

The least effective debate is one where each party holds steadfast to their opinions, refusing to see the reason in an opposing view. It’s a challenge reasoning with racism, but reason does more than restraint.

In the words of King himself: “”Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.”

Tagged , , , , , ,

6 thoughts on “MLK’s speech 50 years on: Has racism become smarter?

  1. gizmo says:

    Dear Monica,

    I hope all is well.
    I just read your piece on racism and it’s so well written.
    Thank you for sharing your views. ;o

    Racism, like all forms of discrimination, has no place in society whatsoever. People who are racist are a disgrace to the human race and a stain on humanity itself. their narrow-minded, bigotted, ignorant attitudes easily demonstrate a lack of intelligence and understanding of other people’s cultural heritage and their unwillingness, as well as naivety to come to terms with the concept of ‘difference and racist people wish to dissociate themselves from it. They feel the need to be so ashamed of the idea of treating people equally regardless of their ethnicity that they have to resort to behaving and feeling in such a despicable way and turning to ‘hate’ to vent their anger and feelings. its sad to see, but it shouldn’t be condoned whatsoever. I just hope someday racism shall end so everyone can live in peace and in harmony.


  2. Conchita says:

    Conchita x

  3. Racism is the product of prejudices and how some parents encourage it by teaching their kids to behave in some way or the other to nurture hatred. It’s sad but the whole world has become racist.

  4. Michelle says:

    I would not doubt that there is cultural bias or some distrust of South Asians by Euros but I don’t know if I can really state that South Asians are hated due to ‘race’. I am a black American and it seems as though the only peoples who are seen as a different ‘race’ are people of African descent and the kind of Asians with almond eyes..and this is due to the European racial classification system based on what they believe LOOKED really different from them. This system fails, even with blacks, who sometimes do not look exactly like what Europeans expect them to look Nigerians or light-skin South Africans or Ethiopians,Somali’s etc. My point is that according to the racial classification system..Indians are considered Caucasion and I have never heard of any ‘racial’ group as hated as ‘blacks’ the world over.

  5. Hi Michelle, thanks so much for reading and taking the time to comment. I agree that appearance plays a part in people’s prejudices, but I disagree that Asians are seen as Caucasian. I could cite endless examples of the racism received by Asians and it’s not about who is the bigger victim, Asians or Blacks. Neither should be a victim; nobody should. I don’t know whether MLK’s dream will ever be realised, but I believe the (peaceful) fight should never stop.

  6. Conchita – agree with your words and thanks so much for reading and leaving your thoughts 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: